The Council for Exceptional Children is pleased to bring you our RTI (Response to Intervention) Blog. Leading experts on RTI will share their thoughts and insights on RTI, its implementation, and how it is affecting educational practice. We encourage you to join the conversation with your comments and questions.
What is RTI?
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-step approach to providing services to struggling students. Teachers provide instruction and interventions to them at increasing levels of intensity. They also monitor the progress students make at each intervention level and use the assessment results to decide whether the students need additional instruction or intervention in general education or referral to special education.
RTI models have several components in common: RTI uses tiers of intervention for struggling students, relies on research-based instruction and interventions, uses problem-solving to determine interventions for students, and monitors students regularly to determine if they are progressing as they should academically or behaviorally.
Many models are based on three or four tiers. Generally, in Tiers 1 and 2 general education teachers provide instruction and interventions. When students fail to respond to small group and intense individualized interventions, they are referred for special education. Special education teachers may help develop interventions and/or plan assessments for students receiving instruction and interventions in Tiers 1 and 2. They may not provide instruction to students until Tier 3 or 4, when the student could be referred and identified for special education.
CEC's Communications Policy
a. Users should demonstrate respect for all participants by appropriate choice of words when using CEC-sponsored online communication vehicles (blogs, interactive communications and messaging, etc.). Expressing contrasting and opposing views is encouraged to stimulate thoughtful debate. Ideas and opinions should be presented with consideration for others.
b. These online communication vehicles are not to be used as a platform to accuse or defame any individual or organization. Users may disagree with comments posted and post a reply, but the reply may not include misleading, derogatory, or disparaging comments under any conditions. Profanity is unacceptable.
c. Users of any CEC-sponsored online communication vehicles are responsible for their postings. These online communication vehicles may not be used to sell or market products or services except with explicit approval of CEC or on behalf of CEC. These vehicles may not be used to libel or violate antitrust regulations. Be aware of copyright issues on the Internet. Users must obtain permission from the author before they quote or utilize other’s work or words.
d. CEC reserves the right to remove comments that violate this policy. Further, CEC reserves the right to remove individuals from participation in any CEC-sponsored online communication vehicles who violate these policies or who continue to detract from discussion by violating etiquette.